4 ms·
I like using GitHub Actions for small automation tasks like this as well, but I'm curious what the execution time is for each of these runs. GH Actions has been
by dinkleberg 6y ago
I like using GitHub Actions for small automation tasks like this as well, but I'm curious what the execution time is for each of these runs. GH Actions has been reliable for me, but it tends to be rather slow due to the architecture. Also I feel like this would chew up all my build mins pretty quick (this is 8000+ runs/month).
Side note, I find it hilarious how many sites use those generic "modern" illustrations which have absolutely nothing to do with the service or page context. I know it's tempting to keep up with the modern design trends, but picking from one of those illustration packs almost always leads to questionable choices.
- harrydehal 6y agoGuilty as charged, as I've used those illustrations for a few personal projects as well. For anyone interested, you can generate custom variations of them here and see more from work from the original artists: https://blush.design/collections https://blush.design/collections
- anandchowdhary 6y ago> I like using GitHub Actions for small automation tasks like this as well, but I'm curious what the execution time is for each of these runs. I did a quick calculation and got to ~3000 minutes per month: https://twitter.com/AnandChowdhary/status/1329667867021770753 https://twitter.com/AnandChowdhary/status/132966786702177075.... > Side note, I find it hilarious how many sites use those generic "modern" illustrations which have absolutely nothing to do with the service or page context Absolutely agreed, but it makes the site so much cuter! I just made a Docusaurus template and used it for a bunch of my open-source landing pages, like https://upptime.js.org https://upptime.js.org and https://stethoscope.js.org https://stethoscope.js.org, but yes, it needs updating!