I don't really see a tone like that in the article. I'm also pretty convinced if a "mishap" like that came to light about the Russian Sputnik, or one of the Ch

I don't really see a tone like that in the article. I'm also pretty convinced if a "mishap" like that came to light about the Russian Sputnik, or one of the Chinese vaccines, then the combative and critical tone would go straight to "How Putin/Xi personally wanted to kill millions of people!" with news outlets all over the planet constantly regurgitating headlines along that line and Hanlon's Razor given zero consideration. While this article ends on the notion of how this is just some kind of "oddity" and yet somehow at the same time allegedly a universal problem of "reporting having slightly nationalistic tone". The article is so muddled up, and long-winded, the result of which is that it barely gains any traction in the online sphere, can't a find a single submission about this on Reddit with more than a dozen upvotes. The few there are the top-comments are very ad-hominemy "Good thing journalists never make mistakes!", which is a reminder that stuff like this [0] is a very real thing. [0] https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/ https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/