>[...] both experts and novices underestimate and overestimate their skills with the same frequency. Looking at these graphs there is maybe some curious conclu

>[...] both experts and novices underestimate and overestimate their skills with the same frequency. Looking at these graphs there is maybe some curious conclusion to be made about the symmetry with imposter syndrome. If we believe to have 'average' (2nd/3d quartile) knowledge about a subject, there are three possibilities: 1. We are correct in this assumption. 2. We are victims of Dunning-Kruger and know less than we believe we do. 3. We are victims of imposter syndrome and know more than we believe we do.