> Which is silly. We can try to improve multiple things at once. Which is naif. There is a limited amount of time and resources that a company can spend on fe

> Which is silly. We can try to improve multiple things at once. Which is naif. There is a limited amount of time and resources that a company can spend on features , prioritizing big things is always the sensible choice. In the specific case of cars, they can't be patched after reaching the market and usually a recall is issued only after something serious has already happened. Thake the example linked below that made the front page: A Tesla car speeds on autopilot when both seats are reclined in sleep mode. Tesla overlooked safety to provide useless features. If they had put big things first, the car would completely stop if the driver seat is being used as a bunk bed. And why the autopilot can go over the limits? They didn't think about it, because the amount of time engineers can spend debugging issues and QA finding problems is limited. (someone in the comment wrote «Teslas often “shadow brake” when driving under overpasses or overhead signs because the radar system gets confused.») https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25545202 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25545202