4 ms·
> Fully canonically, :: is 0000:0000:0000:000:0000:0000:0000:0000. Nitpick: missed a single zero in the middle there.
by phoe-krk 6y ago
> Fully canonically, :: is 0000:0000:0000:000:0000:0000:0000:0000.
Nitpick: missed a single zero in the middle there.
- egocentric 6y agoYou are a hero
- skissane 6y agoThe following comment "My apologies to trypophobic readers" makes me think that the mistake was intentional.
- dave_universetf 6y agoIt wasn't, but I'm glad to have plausible deniability :) I fixed the typo.
- Dagger2 6y agoBigger nitpick: as per RFC 5952, canonically :: is ::. 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 is a valid way of writing the same address, but it's not the canonical way.