2 ms·
But we're not talking about distinct sites -- if by "sites" you mean "domains", not "urls" -- we're talking about distinct webpages, or urls. Even with 100 dis
by zck 15y ago
But we're not talking about distinct sites -- if by "sites" you mean "domains", not "urls" -- we're talking about distinct webpages, or urls.
Even with 100 distinct webpages per day, my point is still valid -- fully half of positives are false positives. One could just as easily argue that the number of one malicious site per day is large -- it certainly is in my experience.
Also, Chrome isn't just for people at work; people use Chrome at home too. Especially early adopters, of which I imagine Chrome's audience is made up of in greater proportion than the population at large. Early adopters would view more pages than the average person anyway.