4 ms·
I suspect it's being downvoted because the pixel resolution on the various species included have little to do with how healthy their populations are or are not.
by rmah 6y ago
I suspect it's being downvoted because the pixel resolution on the various species included have little to do with how healthy their populations are or are not. For example, it's simply impossible for large predators like tigers to exist by the billions. In short, the presentation is a pure play to emotions with little regard to any actual facts.
- fractallyte 6y agoThanks, but I disagree! Most of the pixelized animals number in the hundreds or thousands - horrifyingly low. What diversity and ‚culture‘ can exist within those numbers? There can be a ‚healthy‘ population of 1, but it's still extinction for the species. I wish the downvoters would have the courage to speak up.