It is interesting to hear this argument in Silicon Valley’s double standards and modern “relative moralism” environment. What exactly are your moral concerns? I

It is interesting to hear this argument in Silicon Valley’s double standards and modern “relative moralism” environment. What exactly are your moral concerns? It is “controversial” because people have so many diff. opinions on what is considered “ethical” these days. Palantir has a bad rap in SV because liberal media likes to criticize it mainly due to its work with ICE. There are articles online speculating on the validity of Karp’s claims about his philosophy background, or Palantir’s rumors on helping take down Osama Bin Laden as intentional propaganda. I suspect a lot of these comes as misinformation campaigns to discredit the firm. I tried to investigate a report by Mijente and stopped early due to its data being mostly baseless personal accusations on Thiel (common tactic when pertinent proof is lacking), which seems primarily motivated by a political agenda https://notechforice.com/palantir/ https://notechforice.com/palantir/ Help me if I am wrong, but to me it seems the media is being heavily biased against Palantir because the firm denounced Silicon Valley’s values... Note: Another analogy of double standards is how Apple and Tesla get all the hype, masqueraded by “user privacy” and “saving the environment” PR, while online communities (HN, Reddit) brush away human right violations such as slave labor or work abuse allegations. The brainwashing is clearly working...