3 ms·
I'm not sure I understand how a patent system would ever encourage knowledge to be made public in a way that wouldn't have already happened. Even with a patent
by fastball 6y ago
I'm not sure I understand how a patent system would ever encourage knowledge to be made public in a way that wouldn't have already happened.
Even with a patent system, if your innovation is not easily reverse-engineered then you have no reason to patent it. If you invention is easily reverse-engineered, then the knowledge becomes public effectively as soon as you release your innovation, and that is when a patent is most useful.
- tempestn 6y agoEven if your invention isn't easily reverse engineered, it could still be re-engineered by others once you've demonstrated the concept and the market. Trade secrets aren't guarantees.
- fastball 6y agoRight but that's my point. I don't think there is clear evidence that it encourages innovation, and if the technology can be re-engineered from the end result then you are not really helping society with a patent system. If it cannot be re-engineered from the end product, I don't see a reason anyone would use the patent system.
- tempestn 6y agoGotcha, but I guess the counter would be that you can't really know what someone else will be able to figure out. Some groundbreaking historical discoveries were made in quick succession by multiple people working independently; others weren't.
- brlewis 6y agoI think the system was not designed so much for end products, but for industrial technology that produced end products.