2 ms·
>between now and the inauguration Why the inauguration? >This attack screams anti-government militia What about it screams anything identifiable? Are you su
by betwixthewires 6y ago
>between now and the inauguration
Why the inauguration?
>This attack screams anti-government militia
What about it screams anything identifiable?
Are you sure your biases aren't creeping into your analysis?
- octoberfranklin 6y ago> Are you sure your biases aren't creeping into your analysis? That's allowed on HN, as long as your biases match those of the rest of HN. For example, when somebody criticizes the FCC's fraudulent spectrum auctions and incumbent-preferential policies for poletop attachments, you get to call them a "5G conspiracist". That's allowed on HN.
- ideophobia 6y agoFirst, this isn't an analysis as much as it is pointless speculation on a Y Combinator message board. I already listed some things that stood out to me in another comment. I call out the inauguration because it's literally about to happen? Its the next the largest event in American politics on the calendar. And obviously my assumptions that this is tied to anti government efforts means those involved would likely be stirred up by whatever is currently happening in politics. Everyone's bias creeps into everything they do. Neither of us are immune to that. So calling it out here in such a uselessly rhetorical manner isn't some logical fallacy flag, it's a derailment of the discussion. I'm not even sure what bias you're accusing me of, I guess leftist politics?