4 ms·
I'm not sure if it's only anti government militia. Another possibility could be a heist/digital raid and that this bombing was there to prevent offsite backups
by cookiengineer 6y ago
I'm not sure if it's only anti government militia. Another possibility could be a heist/digital raid and that this bombing was there to prevent offsite backups of a secure data facility.
Nonetheless this seems too coordinated and well executed to be some random hate group, so I agree with you there. Especially with the evacuation messages.
Anybody know if e.g. the Nexus group or similar SSAE data centers had some issues?
- Throwaway1771 6y agoMilitias are not (all) hate groups.
- edoceo 6y agoYou're "countering" an assertion that was not made.
- octoberfranklin 6y agoYou're racist.
- WalterGR 6y agoCould you please knock it off? Your comments on this post are designed only to start flamewars. That sort of thing is frowned upon here. Since one of your comments is about what’s acceptable on HN, then either you know better and are doing it anyway, which is in poor taste, or you don’t know better and therefore shouldn’t be lecturing people about what’s acceptable here. Either by way of refresher or introduction, here are the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- octoberfranklin 6y agoRacism is not acceptable on HN. You have some kind of beef with the DOJ indictment I posted here? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25542215 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25542215 I don't think the DOJ was trying to start a flamewar when they filed that brief.
- dang 6y agoYou've been posting a ton of flamebait and unsubstantive comments to HN. If you keep doing that we will have to ban you, so please stop. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- octoberfranklin 6y agoDan, your "flamebait" characterization is grossly unreasonable. Nobody's flaming me, so if it were flamebait I'd deserve some kind of award for most astonishingly-ineffective flamebait in history. You ought to call it what it is: dissident speech. Dissonant, too. Does dissident speech get people banned from HN? PS, I admit that the (one) ascii-art text banner was silly and inappropriate.
- dang 6y agoI use the word to mean provocative/inflammatory comments that don't contain enough information to outweigh the provocation. Such comments tend to lead to flamewars. Definitions aside, please don't post any more comments like that. We want substantive, thoughtful conversation on HN. Comments like "racist racist racist Fascist racist" are obviously not acceptable, quite apart from ascii art (though what you did with that was also not cool, and you did it at least three times). Please don't post any more unsubstantive comments like these either: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25435883 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25435883 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25428670 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25428670 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25427868 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25427868
- TameAntelope 6y agoIn the US there’s a LOT of overlap.