> Given what little we know, targeting the AT&T infrastructure could be a reasonable guest a motive. This is all I meant. Not meaning to spread conspiracies or

> Given what little we know, targeting the AT&T infrastructure could be a reasonable guest a motive. This is all I meant. Not meaning to spread conspiracies or misinformation. One article (have to find the source) stated that one of the main buildings hit was owned by AT&T and of course the HQ is there. Maybe it's related, maybe not. Just trying to make sense of the situation with limited information.