3 ms·
Reducing the harm of a purposeful, voluntary action -- maybe just to make it personally palatable to your own morality or mission -- doesn't seem to meet the th
by joseph_grobbles 6y ago
Reducing the harm of a purposeful, voluntary action -- maybe just to make it personally palatable to your own morality or mission -- doesn't seem to meet the threshold for a "good deed".
Less of a bad deed, sure. But given that they still did the very dangerous thing, no not a good deed.
The context I replied to implied that tracking a bomber by a warning they gave would be "punishing" a "good deed". That seems dubious.
- swirepe 6y ago>The context I replied to implied that tracking a bomber by a warning they gave would be "punishing" a "good deed". That seems dubious. Oh yeah, sorry, I missed the context. It's a good deed, but not good enough to outweigh, you know, bombing. The recording should be traced like any other part of the bomb.