3 ms·
Yes it does. The disease would have been eradicated a long time ago if it didn't have asymptomatic transmission. (see: SARS and MERS)
by qwerty1234599 6y ago
Yes it does. The disease would have been eradicated a long time ago if it didn't have asymptomatic transmission. (see: SARS and MERS)
- gnusty_gnurc 6y agoSo you're saying the studies are all wrong based on your a priori reasoning that interventions so far have failed? Make a convincing study to disprove them.
- SomeoneFromCA 6y agoAsymptomatic transmission might be not very high, but presymptomatic transmission is very high. It is well established fact, that people are the most contagious right before onset of the symptoms.Keep in mind that the symptoms might be very mild.
- gnusty_gnurc 6y ago> Asymptomatic transmission might be not very high, but presymptomatic transmission is very high. Actually if you read the meta-analysis I linked, 0.7% secondary attack rate covers both presymptomatic and asymptomatic.
- umanwizard 6y agoMERS has not been eradicated.