3 ms·
Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. I should have asked also if Pijul’s current API or user facing semantics will change with 1.0? I admire h
by poletopole 6y ago
Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. I should have asked also if Pijul’s current API or user facing semantics will change with 1.0?
I admire how challenging developing Pijul must be, especially when some of us here critique it without bothering to understand it, so my hat is off to you! But I think most of us here are eager to use Pijul, myself including.
- pmeunier 6y agoThanks! It is a little bit challenging indeed. I've worked on worse systems before, and as always with asynchronicity, the devil is in the details, and there are more details than anyone who hasn't written it can imagine ;-) I don't expect the semantics to change much. The things that need polishing are probably on documentation, error messages, and network. The latest bugs in Pijul itself (i.e. not Libpijul) included handling the case where your HTTP connection drops while you're downloading, and keeping your connection busy, that sort of stuff.