>that's great; the excerpt you posted, however, was phrased as a 'gotcha' -- as in, 'you thought i was talking about a gene, but in fact i was talking about a s

>that's great; the excerpt you posted, however, was phrased as a 'gotcha' -- as in, 'you thought i was talking about a gene, but in fact i was talking about a sex' If you have an issue with that, I suggest you take it up with David Eagleman[0]. I made it very clear (in the first sentence of my comment in fact, as I mentioned previously) what I was talking about. I thought that example to be apt, so I used it. [0] https://www.eagleman.com/ https://www.eagleman.com/