A = Google B = responsible C = not responsible D = again not responsible? or do you mean evil? So, to reply to your argument: When Google makes something n

A = Google B = responsible C = not responsible D = again not responsible? or do you mean evil? So, to reply to your argument: When Google makes something not responsible, or, worse, evil, the numerous "responsible" people that have proven to be part of the staff in the past (see the examples) will make a fuss. Shortly the misdeed would be made public, widely commented, the pressure would make the corporation take countermeasures to repair their image. That's what happened in these 2 examples, and this mechanism is still active. I'm not saying that this will work every time. I'm just highlighting that at Google this mechanism is particularly strong (and so the hate towards Google less understandable). Of course new laws would be even more convincing, if only for those corporations where the self-control is weaker.