I understood what he meant to say (divisible by zero with no remainder - that is, modulus of zero) it was just the equation was surprising. It was technically

I understood what he meant to say (divisible by zero with no remainder - that is, modulus of zero) it was just the equation was surprising. It was technically correct but not useful in context. Otherwise 16/2=0 would fit as well. So figured it was worth clarifying in case anyone else was surprised too. :)