4 ms·
"Quite likely"... yep, you made it all up. We have the testimony of someone, which you blame as one-sided, but then you come up with your alternate story that
by jeromegv 6y ago
"Quite likely"... yep, you made it all up.
We have the testimony of someone, which you blame as one-sided, but then you come up with your alternate story that is also totally one-sided. You do realize you are as biaised right? Except here, you're siding with one of the biggest corporation in the world to assume that they treated their employee fairly. Excuse me if i'm more likely to believe an employee that share the story publicly under her name, might alleniate future employer, etc. More likely to believe that story of someone who worked at Google for that many years, than an anonymous commenter on HN that just came out with their alternate theory to defend the corporation.
If you had read the twitter thread you would know the language is not the reason of the firing, so it seems you also didn't go very far in your "investigation".
- tasubotadas 6y ago> assume that they treated their employee fairly. Biggest corporations in the world have rules and processes and to believe that the manager or corp was out there to "get her" instead of her just being toxic (or use whatever other word for "poor culture fit") would be a violation of Occams Razor.
- jakelazaroff 6y agoNo, it would not. “Her manager was racist” is just as simple an explanation as “she was considered a bad fit despite high performance.”