>>Simply repeating a lie does not make it true. The creators of ethereum created 72 million ether. Once again: a distribution established by a process with ope

>>Simply repeating a lie does not make it true. The creators of ethereum created 72 million ether. Once again: a distribution established by a process with open access, with all parties on equal footing, can be reasonably considered to not be a premine. Calling it a lie, and spouting other inflammatory accusations, doesn't change that. >>100% percent of the funds in the pre-sale were eventually paid back to the founders and their employees starting with a million dollar payment to their CEO the literal day the presale closed (and a few days before he left the org). I don't believe word you say. If you're claiming a massive embezzlement of the BTC funds, go ahead and prove it. The BTC address is known so you should be able to track every transaction. Thus far you've exposed yourself as engaged in little more than a disinfo campaign. >>Even if the presale had been an equal playing field that wouldn't have changed the fact that the issuers of ethereum conducted a security sale The SEC has already said that since the pre-sale happened before the 2017 ICO bulletin they issued, it was exempt from enforcement action. Maybe you could start helping crypto adoption instead trying to lord over people by claiming you know better than them what market options they should utilize, and that it's for their own good for those market options to be shut down and disrupted by government agencies.