3 ms·
Very good point. I've thought that about Google, starting years ago. Look at the Wave fiasco / failure. That would not have happened (at least due to reasons of
by vram22 6y ago
Very good point. I've thought that about Google, starting years ago. Look at the Wave fiasco / failure. That would not have happened (at least due to reasons of unusable slowness) if your suggestion had been implemented there. And there are many other examples of their products needing more machine horsepower.
On the contrary, they equip their developers with high-end machines. How dumb. It should at least be a mix of low and high-end, and should be made compulsory to test the products on low-end satisfactorily before release.
- pjmlp 6y agoIt still happens, see Android development experience with Studio and build times.
- vram22 6y agoYes, seen tangentially earlier, when I consulted to a startup using Android as one of the stacks. Happy I did not have to work on it, going by what I have read about its too frequent changes. Like the JavaScript framework du jour :) https://mobile.twitter.com/vasudevram/status/1270752659402706945 https://mobile.twitter.com/vasudevram/status/127075265940270...