I'm so baffled by this comment. In what sense is retracting a deeply flawed ("fraudulent") study that was invented for a court case the same as a university pu

I'm so baffled by this comment. In what sense is retracting a deeply flawed ("fraudulent") study that was invented for a court case the same as a university pushing a researcher to not publish or retract a paper because it paints the university in a bad light? It seems like you're trying to paint all retractions as equivalently "political", but that's obviously not the case.