3 ms·
> Fitbit, and the like generally don't provide much data that's useful in a healthcare setting. They are not meant to. > people don't necessarily wear them co
by drivebycomment 6y ago
> Fitbit, and the like generally don't provide much data that's useful in a healthcare setting.
They are not meant to.
> people don't necessarily wear them consistently
What are you basing this on ? Anecdotally, I and a few of my friends who are fully into Fitbit are wearing them dutifully. I was also somewhat skeptical but I figured it's not that much money to try. It completely changed my view on Fibit after trying it, and I've been very consistently wearing it.
> However, you could probably determine that yourself.
Not really. There's nothing like honest data and clear metrics to show how behind someone is. It also very successfully turned "fitness" into a game for me - clear, achievable goals and a way of tracking it easily did wonders to keep me motivated.
> The heart rate monitoring is good enough for monitoring the intensity of your own exercise but not good enough for anything diagnostic.
It's not meant to be a short-term diagnostics tool, and if you expect that, I think your expectation is completely misplaced. But it very clearly would be a useful data for the long-term baseline.
They say an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure - Fitbit is doing enough "nudge" to improve that prevention department for me, for a dirt cheap price. It's been an extremely useful and valuable tool and a service for me. I've never consistently tracked my weight, nor exercised consistently - and I have no doubt majority of people fall into a similar bucket. Not everyone would benefit as much, but clearly there's sizable population that would, and Fitbit, for that price, is doing a lot more to keep me motivated and exercise than gym memberships or private trainer or group exercise classes or most such things I've tried in the past. I actually wish Fitbit would allow us to share the exercise records with my primary care doctor - that would keep me even more honest, and would provide better insights and long-term trend data for my doctor.
- ch4s3 6y ago> They are not meant to. I know, that's my whole point. They aren't medical devices and aren't useful for medicine/healthcare beyond showing that you are or are not active. > What are you basing this on ? Anecdotally, I and a few of my friends who are fully into Fitbit are wearing them dutifully Optical blood flow sensors need to be held flat against your skin with minimal movement up and down the arm. That's just hard to do. > It's not meant to be a short-term diagnostics tool Again, that's exactly what I was saying. My only claim was that the "health" data they produce isn't useful for healthcare in a clinical setting. This is the reason health record systems don't import that data. I worked in the medical record space for quite a bit of time, and never met a doctor that wanted this kind of data in a medical record.
- drivebycomment 6y agoThe original post you replied to said: > since we don't have currently good way to use our health data for health purposes It's difficult to share Fitbit data with my primary care doctor. I think this statement describes that situation well (and beyond). And Fitbit data is clearly health data. And nobody has claimed it's for "healthcare in a clinical setting". I think you're beating a straw man you've constructed.