Garbage in equals garbage out. The foundational error I feel is trying to capitalize on peoples attention as opposed to aiding in the public good. Sure when y

Garbage in equals garbage out. The foundational error I feel is trying to capitalize on peoples attention as opposed to aiding in the public good. Sure when youtube and like services were starting out it was the wild west and all about gaining users and creating traction, however that was a long time ago. We now know where that party was headed and how it ended, and it almost ended society! At this point any improvements I feel should be focused on minimizing damage and maximizing the public good. This is the antithesis of anticipating interests as that approach has failed to deliver and even worse has only served to exacerbate echo chambers and divide populations. Better to gauge interests and make suggestions from a large and vetted list of diverse sources as a primary ingredient of a larger cake of suggestions with actual user defined interest suggestions being the subtle and minimal spice.