> the FBI ... but in real life You really are failing to understand the criticism. You can't claim a narrator is unreliable because the fiction doesn't align w

> the FBI ... but in real life You really are failing to understand the criticism. You can't claim a narrator is unreliable because the fiction doesn't align with reality. That's not how that works. You do realize that 1984 was written in the 1940s predicting describing a fictional world nearly 50 years in the future? It's a simple concept you are intentionally ignoring. If you want to claim "unreliable narrator", you need to show that within the fictional world. You can claim it because the fictional world doesn't match the real world. Because using that absurd logic, everything is unreliable.