Thank you for the correction. > mixing or LO spurs, image response, third-order intermodulation products Do I understand it correctly that it will only be a f

Thank you for the correction. > mixing or LO spurs, image response, third-order intermodulation products Do I understand it correctly that it will only be a fraction of the output power and equation (6-1) in https://www.rtca.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/SC-239-5G-Interference-Assessment-Report_274-20-PMC-2073_accepted_changes.pdf https://www.rtca.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/SC-239-5G-In... must have a coefficient so that P_source would become P_source*k_spurious where k_spurious < 1 or even k_spurious << 1? Edit: by not working properly I did not mean that the signal on the target frequency will have severe interference but that just 15kHz apart there could be another target frequency that must be free of interference or otherwise multiple operators will not be able to use the 5G spectrum (12f, ie 180kHz seems to be an accepted guard band as per [1] and FCC seems to have mandated 23MHz guard band [2] which is 127x the norm) or even a single operator will not be able to use OFDM effectively. Am I still wrong in my understanding? Edit 2: with the interfence evaluation from [1], almost all evaluated guard bands result in -20dBm interference which would make proper k_spurious=0.01. My understanding remains that the aviation industry report used overzealous assumptions and overestimated the interference emission power by at least 100x. [1] E. Memisoglu, A. B. Kihero, E. Basar and H. Arslan, "Guard Band Reduction for 5G and Beyond Multiple Numerologies," in IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 644-647, March 2020, doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2963311. [2] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/05/millions-of-gps-devices-at-risk-from-fcc-approved-5g-network-military-says/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/05/millions-of-gps-...