5 ms·
Same experience here. I have to actively curate them by removing some one-off dumb videos from my watch history, but my YouTube recommendations are by far extre
by scrollaway 6y ago
Same experience here. I have to actively curate them by removing some one-off dumb videos from my watch history, but my YouTube recommendations are by far extremely high quality. Youtube is the only service I know of that has actually achieved working content recommendations for me.
My Watch Later has hundreds of hours of content from things that I definitely want to watch but I'm either not yet in the mood for or too long to get to now.
Seriously, youtube for all its flaws is an incredible human achievement on par with wikipedia.
- _0ffh 6y agoI don't use the "watch later" feature anymore. It's always a bit irritating when you want to catch up on the list only to find that a video has been removed in the mean time. So I switched to archiving using youtube-dl. Also nice to have a few backup videos in case of an internet outage.
- scrollaway 6y agoI rarely have that problem with watch later, but it does happen. When I want to ensure a video is available down the line, i send the url to the web archive; they have a special archiver for youtube videos.
- wolco2 6y agoWhat's the link?
- scrollaway 6y agoJust prefix any URL with this exactly: https://web.archive.org/save/ https://web.archive.org/save/ Example: https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUF4afxMpQk https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v... If it's already saved, it'll do a new snapshot, but I believe the archive is smart enough not to duplicate saved youtube videos.
- wintermutestwin 6y agoI tried this and it keeps saying job failed.
- wolco2 6y agoSame issue. Love the concept of saving through a GET link.
- scrollaway 6y agoLooks like the Archive is having some trouble today, but it's also getting throttled because the link is getting clicked a lot. the /save/ link will redirect you to a saved snapshot of the page; it basically tells the archive "capture this page right now".
- jessriedel 6y agoThis is conceivable to me, bit I've never had this happen. What sort of videos would be removed that you actually wanted to watch?
- OJFord 6y agoPeople remove and re-upload (or not) their videos sometimes, so if you could even find it that'd be an annoying extra step.
- nitrogen 6y agoCody's Lab had a video about refining metal ores removed, as one example.
- _0ffh 6y agoApart from what has already been mentioned, stuff also gets copyright-struck. Sometimes for ridiculously minor infractions. Sometimes for no real infraction at all. Additionally, there are the vague and ever-changing terms of service. Also, people sometimes take stuff down themselves. Take the JRE, for a recent and rather prominent example.
- beepboop43 6y agoHappens to me often. I don't think it even tells you what videos are gone. I know I've seen channels say they removed a video themselves because it didn't do well with views so they wanted to re-tweak it in the hope it lands better.
- beepboop43 6y agoJust curious, do you download them one at a time or do you have a "system" for handling them? I ask because this seems like a great idea. I've already written a script to read from a list and download and now I'm wondering if I don't just use use that instead of "watch later" going forward. Curious if you do anything beyond adding them one at a time I should consider before changing my approach.
- scrollaway 6y agoFYI youtube-dl can download playlists. I heavily suspect you can even use --continue to download missing updated bits in a playlist you previously downloaded
- beepboop43 6y agoGood point on the playlists, it hadn't dawned on me that 'watch later' is a playlist. Haven't tried continue, in the past I've created a 'downloaded.txt' file which gets updated as files download and then checked before it runs again so it doesn't try to re-download them.
- scrollaway 6y agoYeah you don't need that downloaded.txt, youtube-dl can do that all on its own with the right flags :)
- JD557 6y ago+1 for cleaning up the watch history. It's pretty nice that youtube let's you edit that and doesn't use a "full history" to train the recommendation algorithm. I try to be careful and always use private browsing when opening "suspicious" videos, but every now and then, one slips and taints my recommendation. OTOH, with a clean history, I barely subscribe to channels, since new videos usually end up in the recommendations, anyway.
- Konohamaru 6y agoHow do you clean up your watch history?
- scrollaway 6y agoGo to "History" in your sidebar: https://www.youtube.com/feed/history https://www.youtube.com/feed/history You can individually remove videos by clicking on Delete (at least on desktop). You can also pause your watch history (eg. for some guest browsing) or clear it entirely (if you want to start from scratch).
- herodoturtle 6y ago"OTOH" = On the other hand. For those that, like me, hadn't seen this one before ^_^
- domador 6y agoMy big curation-related grief has to do with YouTube playlists (the ones you can create with the +Save button on YouTube.) The list of playlists can't be sorted in alphabetical order by playlist name. It seems to be ordered either by playlist creation date and/or by when I last added a video to the list (with most recent playlists first.) I'd say the playlist feature is next to useless to me, except that I keep using it, ever so masochistically. This is a recurring grief I have with Google products: poor UI and a seeming inability to receive and/or act upon feedback from power users.
- oldgregg 6y agoThis is intentional. They want you to just follow their AI more than curate your own world. You live in their world.
- billfruit 6y agoThing is YouTube has hardly any features to manage a playlist that big. I think it does not even allow to search within the playlist.
- zionpi 6y agobut many years later,some videos in watch later list have gone,it seems that no way to find them back.
- nixass 6y agoYouTube provides high quality for everyone, because it knows what your preference is. For poor dumbs the suggestion feed full of conspiracy videos is very extremely quality in their eyes too. The other thing is that we consider their videos - crap