3 ms·
Nobody posts about things that are working fine.
by encom 6y ago
Nobody posts about things that are working fine.
- curt15 6y agoDoes OpenZFS have a similar ratio of bad to good posts?
- washadjeffmad 6y agoZFS's killer feature is religious inspiration. Write holes during resilvers are healthy and natural, but the same in a software RAID 5/6 configuration on BTRFS is unacceptably risky. Brought to you by the same people who don't think SMR disks are used with ZFS in enterprise.
- dmm 6y agoForgive me but I'm completely missing what you're saying here. Are you saying that ZFS has a write hole when reslivering?
- viraptor 6y agoRaid5 on btrfs is not and has not been production ready. It's available in the code, but with appropriate warnings. You're not supposed to be using it, rather than it being "unacceptably risky".
- mike256 6y agoThat's the problem with btrfs. Raid5/6 still isn't production ready and loses data with cheap consumer ssd which could to disappear/reappear in a running system. On the other side raidz/z2 works rock solid. Of course I could use btrfs with mirrors instead but that's the reason why I use cheap consumer ssds. I can't spend that much money just to use btrfs so I stay with zfs.
- viraptor 6y agoIt doesn't, but also their changelogs aren't seen by people who browse Linux changelogs. You'd look at https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases (which also contains a few bug fixes) if you're interested in zfs. Btrfs has quite a few more accidental readers.