I feel like there's a false equivalence being made here. You're comparing wage to net worth. Zuckerberg's net worth is not a function of his replacement cost. I

I feel like there's a false equivalence being made here. You're comparing wage to net worth. Zuckerberg's net worth is not a function of his replacement cost. It's the percentage of his own company that he owns, valued at market price. This happens to be worth $100B at current market levels, but it is independent of whether he continues to work at Facebook or anywhere else. It's not compensation for labour.