> Russia has no logistical capacity to move any of those weapons far beyond it's borders like it had in Soviet Era. They could do single assault with 50-70k tro

> Russia has no logistical capacity to move any of those weapons far beyond it's borders like it had in Soviet Era. They could do single assault with 50-70k troops 300 km from their borders but they could not rotate or supply them or provide enough air cover. Unless they can build a staging ground at a leisure pace in an ally country. Not to say that it was building up its already significant military logistics. Now, why do you think such a such a force needs even bigger logistics buildup, far exceeding defensive use scenario? All past of your comments on military strategy give off so much of youthful maximalism. In conflict, always expect the worst past holistic comparison. All things that "could never happen" according to military analysts do eventually happen. A saying is you never expect the enemy to attack where you expect him the most.