3 ms·
ncmncm>>> ... Applied to moons of Jupiter and Saturn ... [implications that there is something scientists are missing about "material leaving the poles"] matth
by nl 6y ago
ncmncm>>> ... Applied to moons of Jupiter and Saturn ... [implications that there is something scientists are missing about "material leaving the poles"]
matthewdgreen>> ... I have no idea what the situation is with current theories on the motion of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn....
ncmncm> Motions of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn? Opinions of enthusiasts with pet theories? What are you talking about?
It was pretty clear to me what @matthewdgreen was talking about.
- ncmncm 6y agoAlthough clearly nothing about what I wrote.
- nl 6y agoHe addressed exactly what you wrote. (Unless you mean whatever your pet theory is about gravity or magmatism or whatever, and he addressed why that isn't worth discussing too).
- ncmncm 6y agoYou illustrate my point, as well, and so forcefully! Electro-"magma"-tism has not been anybody's pet theory for going on 150 years.
- nl 6y agoCongratulations? I think that perhaps you think people are paying a lot more attention to your theory than you think. We are talking about scientific consensus, and you seem to be talking about something else.
- ncmncm 6y agoYou have no faint idea what you are talking about. I don't have any "theory". Why do you reply to things that you cannot even bring yourself to take the time to read and comprehend? Who do you imagine you are fooling?