3 ms·
It is a little dystopian isn't it? In European history tattoos specifically are associated with punishment, judgement and exploitation: Cain was "marked" and ba
by jacobwilliamroy 6y ago
It is a little dystopian isn't it? In European history tattoos specifically are associated with punishment, judgement and exploitation: Cain was "marked" and banished from eden, slaves and prisoners both past and present have born brands or tattoos which marked them as second-class citizens. In the United States, being marked by the government specifically is considered a sign of the apocalypse so there is a very strong fear about such things.
However this can have a positive effect in a different context. Maori don't come from a Christian background, so the act of marking people has a completely different meaning. If my life story is permanently written on my skin, that's a strong motivator to live well and do things I can be proud of. If my ancestry is part of my public identity, then I must also be excellent, so that my actions reflect well on my descendents and those descendents have a good role model to emulate in their lives. I think it encourages a strong sense of individual responsibility, a focus on supporting the community and multigenerational thinking.
- jelliclesfarm 6y agoI understand that. I am from the south of India and in the villages, women get the names of their clans and names of their husbands tattooed on their arms after they get married. There are tattoos for soldiers, for achievements and tattoos for shaming. South Indian original tribes probably have aboriginal roots than Polynesian but I suppose the intention was the same. But everyone is somewhat ‘urbanized’ now and we don’t live in tribal societies anymore. That has its advantages but also makes those who follow older customs more vulnerable.