3 ms·
1. 10Gbe copper requires fast switching and more shielding - there was a discussion here a few days ago that it's still very expensive - there will be probably
by nisa 6y ago
1. 10Gbe copper requires fast switching and more shielding - there was a discussion here a few days ago that it's still very expensive - there will be probably 2.5Gbe ethernet soon that is a compromise on price/complexity and speed.
2. As someone developing part-time with others on a community mesh network if you somehow can use a wire use the wire. no discussion. 802.11ax (wifi 6) does improve quite a lot, but in the end there a quite a few requirements to reach 1.3gbps. noise, distance, mimo-antennas, driver-issues, fresnel-zone should be free, enough free channels to blast 80mhz of wifi data through the air at 1024QAM - all devices must speak wifi 6 - then there is latency due to aggretation and due to the high bitrates the distance is usally very low.
On the one hand you have reliable 110mbyte/s on wire vs. maybe sometimes a little bit more via wifi.
- moonbug 6y ago>there will be probably 2.5Gbe ethernet soon NBase-T is the magic, will train 2.5, 5 or 10g over cat5e, depending on the cabling
- jsjohnst 6y ago> 10Gbe copper requires fast switching and more shielding That depends greatly on your cable length. A 50ft run (about the distance commonly found from switch to device in an average home) will _easily_ operate trouble free and full speed over Cat5e. It’s only necessary to use Cat6/Cat6A/Cat7 when you are going over long cable lengths (most reputable sources say ~125ft is the max for reliable 10GbE over Cat5e, adding an additional ~50ft for Cat6, and up to ~330ft for 6a/7)