4 ms·
It is. But he also wrote this in a subsequent tweet: > For a typically long running app like an email client, the obsession with shipping as little JavaScript
by konha 6y ago
It is.
But he also wrote this in a subsequent tweet:
> For a typically long running app like an email client, the obsession with shipping as little JavaScript as possible is actually detrimental to the end UX.
- ZephyrBlu 6y agoI'd argue that's almost objectively true. For a long running app, initial load time isn't as important as something like a ecommerce store.
- ymolodtsov 6y agoHey probably is the worst example for this approach, even though it works and it's impressive what they were able to achieve. It should be much better for most website out there that aren't trying to be a low latency app you run 24 hours a day.
- strzibny 6y agoNope. And I will tell you why. To read my email I need the app to load. Gmail did not load for me in several countries and takes forever on a train wifi for example. I never leave an email tab open, but even if I did, I first need it to load...