3 ms·

What's weird is that the bill doesn't have an or conjunction between clause 1 and 2 lol.

• thaumasiotes 6y ago
  That's not weird. The bill says "a transmission service that (1); (2); or (3)". That's just how English conjunctions work when you're joining more than two things.
  • ummonk 6y ago
    Yeah, fair enough. I'm just used to seeing most legal codes have a conjunction between each element of a list for clarity, or a description before the list whether each element needs to be satisfied or just one of them.
    • deleted 6y ago
      [deleted]