5 ms·
Yes, getting things done is very important because the tendency around MIT is to get lost in all of the interesting intellectual distractions. But her experien
by xhkkffbf 6y ago
Yes, getting things done is very important because the tendency around MIT is to get lost in all of the interesting intellectual distractions.
But her experience with space suits seems to be pretty different from the computers and artistry that dominated the Media Lab in the past. There has been lots of robotics but not much material science.
Of course she's in the right social circles. She knows how to navigate MIT politics. But so did Ito-- until he was fragged.
I just don't see much in her past that overlaps with what made the Media Lab interesting. So maybe she'll adapt. Or maybe she'll just turn it into some kind of combination of fashion and materials place.
- nhf 6y agoA good football coach doesn't have to be great at playing the style that they coach their players for. Having worked with her before, Dava is a great leader and manager - which is I think what's needed for a position like this.
- SoSoRoCoCo 6y agoTed Lasso, is that you?
- gbpz 6y agoYou've met Dava?
- nhf 6y agoShe used to be the director of the graduate program I was in.
- gbpz 6y agoThat's pretty cool. I feel like these people (who very smart people choose to lead), must be some next level incredible intellect.
- nhf 6y agoIt's a double edged sword especially in academia. People who are excellent at executing in their field of choice are not always good managers. This is a bit of a personal soapbox, but I think one of the most entrenched problems in graduate education is the assumption that someone who is promoted on their academic merit will also make for an effective advisor/lab manager/project director/etc. Depending on what you do, you might have a natural gift or be a good learner for management skills—but you also may not. If you're not and shoehorned into it for tenure (or whatever other reason), both you and your students suffer.