3 ms·
With an emoji for everything known to humankind one would think there were barcode characters in unicode but, nope. Could be useful, probably not too hard to i
by UncleEntity 6y ago
With an emoji for everything known to humankind one would think there were barcode characters in unicode but, nope.
Could be useful, probably not too hard to include but they have other priorities apparently...
- mark-r 6y agoUnicode is about the characters themselves, not about the glyphs. Its fonts that provide the connection between them.
- scrollaway 6y agoThis is not possible for several reasons, one of which being that as mark-r says, Unicode defines the characters themselves; hence why a font works so well. The second reason is that there are a LOT of barcode algorithms, so you would be duplicating the entire encodable codeblock (which is sometimes larger than ascii) a bunch of times. The third issue is that barcode algorithms are not usually literal 1:1 stand ins. Barcodes usually have the equivalent of a header and footer, and often, a character will influence how the next one looks. At a guess, this font can (and probably does) handle that with font ligatures.