6 ms·
> has no commercially significant purpose or use other than to publicly perform works protected under title 17
by whiddershins 6y ago
> has no commercially significant purpose or use other than to publicly perform works protected under title 17
- pbourke 6y agoThat seems like a thing that will be litigated. Who knows what it will mean after it’s been through the ringer of the US court system.
- dmurray 6y agoIt doesn't have to meet that criterion to fit the definition. It could meet clause 1 or (more likely on GP's examples) clause 3 instead).
- ummonk 6y agoWhat's weird is that the bill doesn't have an or conjunction between clause 1 and 2 lol.
- thaumasiotes 6y agoThat's not weird. The bill says "a transmission service that (1); (2); or (3)". That's just how English conjunctions work when you're joining more than two things.
- ummonk 6y agoYeah, fair enough. I'm just used to seeing most legal codes have a conjunction between each element of a list for clarity, or a description before the list whether each element needs to be satisfied or just one of them.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]