4 ms·
Exactly. I was happy to pay €10/month to DAZN when they had the streaming rights for a football league I was interested in, but then after two years they lost t
by sleavey 6y ago
Exactly. I was happy to pay €10/month to DAZN when they had the streaming rights for a football league I was interested in, but then after two years they lost the rights to Sky via whom the minimum payment to get access to the same content was €30+ month. The content did not suddenly get 3x more valuable between seasons, this is just a big company being greedy. You reap what you sow and all that.
- grogenaut 6y agoYou could, you know, just stop paying attention to sports you don't find it worth paying for. I did that with nfl when they upped rates. Just watch the recaps, so you can chat about it. Baseball, which I like, seems to be a pretty good deal to me, ends up being about .97$ a game for 3 hours of content. So I choose to pay for it. My only real complaint is I can't watch it offline.
- cgriswald 6y agoBaseball is an exceptional deal if you're an out-of-market fan since you can see nearly all of your team's games. It was even better a few years ago when, during commercial breaks, they just threw up a logo and offered silence.
- grogenaut 6y agoI find that they're all over the place on what actually has the commercials and what doesn't. The network broadcasts are the worst. I will say that nfl does have a nice feature (it's like $25 for the end of the season so I can watch stuff delayed) where about an hour or 2 after the game (editing time) they actually just auto-cut the broadcast so there are no commercial breaks.