>Is that just a way to selectively enforce? Doubtful. If other US policies are anything to judge by, it is a way to brand normal organizations as criminal orga

>Is that just a way to selectively enforce? Doubtful. If other US policies are anything to judge by, it is a way to brand normal organizations as criminal organizations for media purposes and to be able to use other tactics against them (civil forfeiture, 'throwing the book at them', etc). See: US Drug War re: Heroin Say, a BLM chapter has a copywritten song playing in the background and is taking donations on stream, that would check the boxes of: - for profit - streaming copywritten content It may not be written exactly like this, but I have zero doubt it will eventually be used this way. Streaming is only going to become more pervasive and copyrights are extremely broad + can be basically infinite extendable which allows the justice system to roll up and brand orgs as criminal.