9 ms·
Running ads on copyrighted content that you didn't pay for is pretty nasty. Is that your position, defending profiteering off of someone else's content?
by anonunivgrad 6y ago
Running ads on copyrighted content that you didn't pay for is pretty nasty. Is that your position, defending profiteering off of someone else's content?
- sukilot 6y ago"someone else's" is a view of property rights that not all hold. "profiteering" (vs just covering costs) assumes facts not in evidence.
- vmception 6y agoI didn't state a position. You assume I implied one. The point was that this will cast a wide net over many services, in response to people pointing out who it wouldn't affect as it didn't seem they considered how most "amateur streamers" operate.