3 ms·
Sorry but this has no sense at all. From 20 years on I work only with Apple based desktops/laptops. And I am a pixel peeper. Scaling is not a problem even on Ma
by nbzso 6y ago
Sorry but this has no sense at all. From 20 years on I work only with Apple based desktops/laptops. And I am a pixel peeper. Scaling is not a problem even on MacBook Pro from 2013. If you want to rationalise a purchase of new Apple Display XDR there are more factual reasons for this. Don't get me wrong - the new displays are very competitive for grading middle market, but most professionals are using separate proofing displays for testing.
I am talking about good quality display with bearable price.
Not display for $6,299.00
Example:
https://www.amazon.de/EV3285-BK-Monitor-DisplayPort-Reaktionszeit-Aufl%C3%B6sung/dp/B07D58QQ9N/ref=sr_1_1?__mk_de_DE=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&crid=2S9OU67TEVS94&dchild=1&keywords=eizo+flexscan+32+zoll&qid=1608646957&sprefix=eizo+flexscan+32%2Caps%2C224&sr=8-1 https://www.amazon.de/EV3285-BK-Monitor-DisplayPort-Reaktion...
- sgerenser 6y agoI upgraded from a MacBook Pro with a good quality LG 4K 27” display using non integer scaling to a 5k 27” iMac with 2x scaling. Both provide the same visible screen area and not give you the same size icons and text. But the iMac with integer scaling is a better, sharper picture. The difference isn’t huge but it’s noticeable.