3 ms·
The article does NOT mention heavy metals anywhere. Maybe implied. But instead it focuses on fear mongering like this gem: > “It is like having a cyborg baby:
by ballenf 6y ago
The article does NOT mention heavy metals anywhere. Maybe implied. But instead it focuses on fear mongering like this gem:
> “It is like having a cyborg baby: no longer composed only of human cells, but a mixture of biological and inorganic entities,” said Antonio Ragusa, director of obstetrics and gynaecology at the San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli hospital in Rome, and who led the study. “The mothers were shocked.”
- EinwegPlastik 6y agoIt doesn't. Thats what i added as additional information. From the text, 'toxins' are mentioned: "Further studies need to be performed to assess if the presence of microplastics may trigger immune responses or may lead to the release of toxic contaminants, resulting in harm." Not sure if this is missleading if i add information i'm aware of.
- hajimemash 6y agoIt's misleading because you're stating something false. You adamantly say the article says one thing when it ain't there. You: 'Its described in the article itself that microplastic attracts/collects toxins (heavy metals etc.)' Article: 'Further studies need to be performed to assess if the presence of microplastics may trigger immune responses or may lead to the release of toxic contaminants' Maybe and does is one difference. The absence of the mention of heavy metals which you state is from the article itself is another difference. I like the other stuff you said though.