Well, yes and no. This isn't a post about, say, lock-free algorithms, which are, in nature, decoupled from human behavior. Her attitude _is_ part of the conte

Well, yes and no. This isn't a post about, say, lock-free algorithms, which are, in nature, decoupled from human behavior. Her attitude _is_ part of the contention itself; for example, there's mention of a career block because she was perceived as intimidating, there's frequent self-flattery, there's an unprofessional insulting of the employer, and so on. Her position is supposed to be covered by a people's person. Of course, there is also at least one mention of colleagues' behavior that is, I suppose, straight illegal, and this is alarming. As I wrote, verbatim, this supports an impression. I didn't write she's wrong.