3 ms·
One difference is a 4 year old can't accidentally counterfeit currency. However, there is a real chance that a 4 year old could post a picture. If only prosecu
by Buttons840 6y ago
One difference is a 4 year old can't accidentally counterfeit currency. However, there is a real chance that a 4 year old could post a picture.
If only prosecutors were blindfolded, administering "justice" evenly and blindly, without regard for political fallout: "It doesn't matter who posted this cat picture, they must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Oh shit, it's a 4 year old, this isn't going to make 'the land of the free' look very good."
- JoBrad 6y agoDoesn’t justify the legislation, but I believe the streaming has to be intentional, and is directed at companies.
- emiliobumachar 6y agoI haven't read the law, but I'm a priori very skeptical of "directed at" reasoning in law. After it's on the books, it will be used to go after whoever the prosecutor wants to go after, subject to their constituents and vested interests with access. Only a couple years ago they were prosecuting teen couples for child pornography for having nudes of each other.