3 ms·
Overall a good article, although the claim that "WiFi has 11 channels and can give you 220Mbit in the air" is just wrong. You'll never deploy on all 11 channel
by willidiots 15y ago
Overall a good article, although the claim that "WiFi has 11 channels and can give you 220Mbit in the air" is just wrong. You'll never deploy on all 11 channels without causing massive adjacent channel interference. 802.11 likes 25 MHz per AP, and the 2.4GHz channels are only 5 MHz apart. Deploying on anything other than 1, 6 or 11 will cause more problems than it will solve.
Additionally, dismissing the 5 GHz channels by claiming "those have lots of issues with many devices" is a facile argument. Deploying 5GHz channels (of which there are many more than 2.4GHz) is an excellent strategy in many cases - it enables you to offload 5GHz-capable clients (laptops, tables) from the 2.4GHz radios, freeing them up for 2.4GHz-only systems (smartphones, old laptops).
Anybody looking to deploy WiFi at a large conference needs to read Aruba Networks' High-Density Validated Design Guide, regardless of the hardware vendor you choose:
http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/technology/DG_HighDensity_VRD.pdf http://www.arubanetworks.com/pdf/technology/DG_HighDensity_V...
Appendix B and C contain some excellent information on planning and theory.
- willidiots 15y agoThat said, I don't want to sound like I'm ripping into this article too bad. Sashimi is really cool.
- cramforce 15y agoI might have been a little harsh on the 5GHz. There is currently a pretty widespread active problem (might depend on AP hardware/software) with some Apple hardware that is pretty much impossible to debug on a large scale, so that the only option we found was to disable it.
- gonzo 15y agoHmm, appendix 'C' makes many references to EIRP, but 802.11's OFDM modes are EVM-limited above 36Mbps for most receivers.
- willidiots 15y agoI am but a humble network engineer and mostly unfamiliar with EVM. I'd love if you could expand on its importance in this scenario.