true and should hit home with most, but still flawed. especially the biting conclusion. > Not by going back through our history and figuring out what caused th

true and should hit home with most, but still flawed. especially the biting conclusion. > Not by going back through our history and figuring out what caused the Personal Computer Revolution. Which is a shame. the thing is, these aren’t the days of the PC revolution. there is a baseline complexity which is easily an order of magnitude greater than the most complex systems of that day. to stick with the concept of a single machine, just the ME in a PC today is more complex than the entire machine back then. mostly to our benefit.