3 ms·
When he used that money to fund the production of substitutes, and provided it for free to those who didn't have insurance, then how does your viewpoint change?
by soperj 6y ago
When he used that money to fund the production of substitutes, and provided it for free to those who didn't have insurance, then how does your viewpoint change?
- briefcomment 6y agoDid he really?
- howlgarnish 6y agoAnd did that happen after or before the media outcry?
- 1000units 6y agoThe marginal cost of an additional course of the drug is negligible. What makes you think Shkreli would have ever withheld it from the uninsured? Lust for death? That'd be an odd quality for a pharma guy, he'd be in the wrong profession. You're thinking maybe mortician or mercenary.