3 ms·
This nugget stood out for me: "In my experience most codebases have a pure functional subset, and I believe writing that subset in a pure-functional style is ne
by motohagiography 6y ago
This nugget stood out for me: "In my experience most codebases have a pure functional subset, and I believe writing that subset in a pure-functional style is nearly always a win for the long-term health of the project."
This is probably often true. In high level applications, the idea of classing or abstracting out your i/o from the core functionality is appealing from a security and reasoning perspective, but not sure if serious developers think that way.
Would you need to understand the rationale behind the codebase from a functional perspective, and even the economics of the business logic behind the features? It's kind of an architects view of "this thing essentially reduces to a queue and if I optimize for this, I get more value."
- pydry 6y agoIMO it's useful for code which is heavy on logic/decision-making. Code which is mainly about hooking systems together and managing state benefits from it much less. I also find that people who are used to a certain kind of project (e.g. heavily logical) and spend years on it have this tendency to assume all code is the same way.