> Scheme is far, far more performant than C.L. and that's due to language design choices. Even if that claim is empirically pretty dubious it's idiosyncratic

> Scheme is far, far more performant than C.L. and that's due to language design choices. Even if that claim is empirically pretty dubious it's idiosyncratic at best to compare putative design impacts of specifications (rather than implementations) between CL and scheme ... when python is in your mix. I suspect this isn't going anywhere useful so I'm out.